There are several important variables to the Greek debt crisis that most people aren’t talking about.
You’ve probably heard about the debt crisis in Greece. You’ve probably heard about the referendum and how the Greek people voted to reject the terms being pushed onto them by the Eurogroup.
You’ve probably heard people speculating as to whether Greece will be forced out of the Eurozone.
However there are several important variables in this crisis that most people aren’t talking about.
- The debt in question is illegitimate. Approximately 90% of the money from these loans issued by the IMF and the ECB was used to bail out private banks. This shifted the consequences of their bad investments to the public sector and to the taxpayers. If the loans weren’t used to help the Greek people, then why should they have their pensions looted and their taxes raised to pay it off? This is predatory lending. That’s what the IMF does.
- The Greek debt is not sustainable. It never was. The IMF has itself acknowledged this in internal reports. However both the IMF and the ECB have refused to consider writing off any of the debt in their negotiations with the Greek government. If creditors refuse to accept a haircut, any bailouts would just push Greece deeper into debt, essentially kicking the can down the road. The IMF and ECB know this, but they don’t care.
- Greece is just the tip of the iceberg. France, Portugal, Italy, Ireland, and Spain are all facing unsustainable debt loads. This will come to a head eventually. The way the crisis unfolds in Greece is setting precedent. This is why the Eurogroup is taking such a hardline approach with Greece. The last thing they want is to have Spain, Italy and Portugal get the idea that they can default without consequences.
(The Greek debt in question is only worth about €300 billion. The Spanish debt on the other hand currently stands at over a trillion, and the Italian debt stands at 2.6 trillion.)
However this approach could very well backfire. Anti-Euro parties from both the left and the right have been gaining traction throughout the Eurozone in recent years. The showdown in Greece seems playing into their hands.
I. Global contagion is a real risk, and not just because of Greece. China’s stock market has lost over 30% of it’s value in three weeks, with total losses currently standing at over 3.7 trillion dollars. At this point even mainstream investors like Carl Icahn are warning that the U.S. stock market is in a massive bubble. The thing about bubbles is they tend to look for an excuse to pop.
Some people have convinced themselves that the 2008 crisis was a one time event, and that it couldn’t happen again. They is wishful thinking. The question isn’t “if” we will see another widespread financial crisis, but rather what will be the catalyst which triggers it.
II. Central bankers may not able to stabilize markets in the next leg of the crisis. The Federal Reserve never actually tightened monetary policy. The 4.48 trillion dollars in bonds that they bought out between 2008 and 2014 are still on their books and they have been rolling these investments over as they mature. And the Fed’s zero interest rate policy is still in force, in spite of hints that they may raise rates later this year.
Another round quantitative easing in event of a new crisis may not have the desired effect. The same principle is at play all around the world. The problem with kicking cans down the road, is that those cans tend to get bigger, and at some point you break your foot. http://www.cnbc.com/id/102605156
So what’s next?
In the short term, Greece is headed for some rough waters no matter how the negotiations proceed from here. The Greek banking system will not be able to function without outside help, and outside help hinges upon an agreement with creditors, who don’t seem very eager to compromise at this point.
If chaos follows, there will be a fierce battle to control the narrative. The rhetoric from the Eurogroup is predictable.
At each phase of the crisis they have insisted that the solution to the problems created by the E.U. is to move towards full political and financial integration.
In other words: they screwed up because you didn’t give them enough power. Where have we heard that before?