In 2011, experts and scientists from around the world gathered in Toronto, Canada to present new and established evidence that questions the official story of 9/11. This evidence was presented to a distinguished panel of experts over a 4 day period.
Through their analysis and scientific investigations, they hope to spark a new investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Press For Truth and The International Center for 9/11 Studies Present:
"The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception"
Introduction (1/5):
Day One:
Day Two:
Day Three:
Day Four:
In our quest for the truth, we have to confront some harsh realities.
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/tor911hear
Is Dr Judy Woods and her Directed Energy Weapons evidence included in this hearing. I hope so. Some parties in the 911 Truth Movement Gage/Steven Jones/Fetzer have dismissed her in the past, even though she has done some of the best work for 911.
ReplyDeleteBut the chance of a new investigation is great.
So to GOD/Creator I say, Please I hope "NO" TO GOD I DEMAND that the 9/11 truth be told in full to the world. I DEMAND that those responsible to be found and charged to the full extent of our International Laws.
DO NOT let this go the way of JFK. He had the Warren Commission (1963), then the House Select Committee on Assassinations (1977 - 14 years apart) and both dropped the ball. 9/11 (2001 - 2012 11 years) I was expecting this at some point, I just expect the elites to allow this hopefully new investigation go the way of JFK.
Gary Jones
Thanks, Gary. That makes as much sense as Judy Woods.
DeleteThis is very important work you are doing. I hope you are incognito so that you stay well.
ReplyDeleteDr Judy Wood's research should be a worldwide hit,
ReplyDeleteshe makes more sense even than AE911.
I purchased and read Dr. Judy Wood's book. Her work does indeed seem scientific and convincing to me (a non-scientist). It would be more convincing if she were to explain how the energy from the hurricane (or some other Tesla-like, free-energy source) may have been harnessed. Did the perpetrators merely plug in an electric cord to the hurricane/vortex, or did they have a wi-fi connection to it? Wood's extensive use of Wikipedia as support for some of her arguments also weakens her case. The Wikipedia references are like a hall of mirrors. These animadversions notwithstanding, the scientific evidence she has amassed argues for a re-examination of the 9/11 events.
ReplyDelete