Earth is not revolving around the Sun (the way you think)!

Wonderful new theory that makes a lot of sense: Earth and all the planets of our solar system, are f...

Wonderful new theory that makes a lot of sense: Earth and all the planets of our solar system, are following the Sun in a heliocentric movement.

The entire Universe is in motion & Expanding. So, our closest stars are most certainly moving in the same direction as we do.

We should also keep in mind that space is very-very vast. The distances are so huge that our brains can't relate to them. In space we speak of billions of light years. In 10,000 "Earth-years" there are no significant changes. Our recent history has about 6,000 years, and the human life span is about 70 years. What do we know? We are barely begin to learn & we must be very open minded. The process of learning should never stop. Those who don't accept new ideas, are in fact obstructing evolution. That's why there's always a "conflict" between the old & new generations. We have to accept new theories and work with them in a constructive way.

Details & Data:

Earth Is Not Orbiting The Sun in the way we were taught More to do with Something Wrong With The Sun Moon & Earth series. Here we find an understanding of Why the Earth & our solar system do not actually orbit the Sun as taught, "Rather", We follow or better still, are dragged by the Sun in a Spiral Pattern through the universe & time.

This video offers explanations how, besides spinning on its axis and rotating as if going 'Around' the Sun, the Earth is shown to 'Follow' the Sun's movement through the Milky Way galaxy, in a continuous Spiral, not a Flat elliptical plane, thus we find a 3D universe as opposed to the accepted 2D.

** Believe it or not, there is no empirical evidence that the Earth actually orbits the sun ! **

This compilation of videos runs thus:

"The solar system's motion thru space by The Resonance Project / Nassim Haramein"

This simple animation was created by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project Foundation

This is a video clip that every human should see.

Many of us have been taught about how the solar system works by viewing a physical model that has the sun in the middle with the planets going around and around in a simple circular orbit without properly accounting for the motion of the sun (aprox. 450,000 miles per hour).

Because the both sun and the galaxy are moving through space, the Earth spirals an incredible distance through space in a year's time. How far the Earth moves depends on the reference point you are using for something "stationary" or "background" even though all objects in the universe are in motion.

The Earth rotates at 0-1040 mi/hr (depends on latitude)
The Earth orbits the sun at aprox. 66,629 mi/hr
The sun orbits the galactic centre at aprox. 447,000 mi/hr

In just considering how fast the sun is moving, we know the Earth travels at least 3,918,402,000 miles in a years time! (as it also orbits around the sun)

Total speed of the Earth moving through space is difficult to approximate do to the combination of motions.
Using Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation it is estimated the total motion of the Earth through space is aprox. 1,342,000 mi/hr
Or 11,763,972,000 miles in 1 year!
(which is still only 0.2% the speed of light!)

The old model might make one picture being back where you started after a year of time has past, when in fact, you are over 11 BILLION miles from where you were a year ago!

I hope this video helps people to visualize what the motion of the Earth in our solar system looks like.

For more information on Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project, please visit:


"Nassim Haramein describing the limitations of the 2D solar system image, and how our evolution imprints space time. Excerpt from the film 'Earth Pilgrims'".


"This animation is a video screenshot from Voyage through The Solar System version 1.20 (1989) and shows the earth's true motion in spirals. Besides spinning on its axis and rotating around the Sun, the Earth also follows the Sun's movement through the Milky Way galaxy. "

Please Visit




Dear Friends,
HumansAreFree is and will always be free to access and use. If you appreciate my work, please help me continue.

Stay updated via Email Newsletter:


Cosmos 172881216862315742

Post a Comment

  1. He states that the earth rotating around the sun would cause the same orbit and thus it would be "like ground hog year" or duplicate years. This would only be possible if the motion of the planets were considered the only 'outside' forces acting on our "year". I'm still not seeing proof of this motion that is being held as fact.


  3. Our beautiful Earth is speeding through time and space to take her place next to the New Super Central Sun, Jupiter, at the new Center of the Milky Way Galaxy. She is to take her rightful place as the newest and brightest Star. During this journey of the heart, mind, physical being, and all it's parts, ascension is taking place within and without. Divine Intervention has been decreed by our Creator through the Celestial hierarchy and this is why we see so many motherships guiding us along the path in the skies above and throughout inner earth along with the Agarthans. They are members of the Galactic Federation of Light and the day is at hand for great reunions and much needed assistance to go through the Crystal Chambers and become full members of the Universal Order as Galactic Citizens. Oh, joy! Be still my heart! This provides a missing acknowledgment I've been watching for. And so it is... Many thanks! xoxox

  4. i agree that this seems 'plausible' but not much more..
    @Eddie what rings correct usually is?
    for just you or for all of humanity? i'm pretty sure that is not the case for the latter so i guess you're a pretty special dude.

  5. just by considering that the fact our sun is revolving in the galaxy his theory folllows and it is this truth that should be taught in our schools.

  6. i definitely agree that the way we model the solar system should take into account the dynamic 3d environment that it exists in. even as a kid i thought the flat planar set-up looked hokey.

    i would like to hear other perspectives besides Nassim Haramein's on more accurate representations of our solar system's path through space from the perspective of the solar system.

    my reservations about Nassim's theory are as follows:

    1) his spatial models in general are highly reduced, clean, and strictly symmetrical geometrical forms (spirals, 6-point stars, cones, helixes, etc.) .. the chaos of lived experience suggests to me that the world of perfect forms is always undercut by fragmentation, dispersal, and distortion so that idealized totems are only ever half the story

    2) baseless spiritual ideas possibly interfering with the science

    3) even a three dimensional helix model of our solar system is still taken from an inexplicably neutralized side view, as if the solar system is a passing train and the viewer stands on a stable, flat field adjacent to the tracks. this is certainly an improved model over the 2d representation from our 1st grade class rooms, but I suspect future models will take into account the curved space/time that would distort the sight lines of a viewer of our solar system from the perspective of a universe always in flux..

  7. @ 1) but icicles always form perfect geometric shapes, that is but one example of many throughout nature

  8. Have you guys ever heard of the theory of relativity? Its out of what or who's perspective you look at things.

  9. None of this resonates with me.
    I will take nothing from it.

  10. [i]UNBELIEVABLE BUT TRUE *** shortly before the end of Illuminati End Times, angelic Google ...[/i]
    [b]Laws of End Times[/b]
    As of today, as for the very last four years of Illuminati End Times, angelic Google returns the TRUTH as [b]#1[/b]
    Because in our TIMES nothing escapes its LAWS.

  11. Very beautiful, but incomplete. The graphics give the impression of a Slinky toy slightly pulled. But if you account for the relative speeds of the Earth around the Sun, and Sun itself, then it sould be more accurate to visualize a Slinky stretched out -- so that (eg) a 4" diameter slinky would have 20" inches between each loop.

    The other question is the axis of rotation around the sun. If we imagine an orrery being pulled (representing the motion of the sun), is it being pulled straight up, or off to one side? If up, then the images of the torus make perfect sense -- but if not, then I wonder if the torus has any relevance at all?

  12. Wait!! Let's look at perception itself...that's what is missing in this Earth and Sun concept,OBJECT RELATIONS...then think way passed that, and maybe realize that the universe, and everything else is like one 'Mobius strip'(a phenomenon that happens when you take a long sheet of paper and cut it and twist-curves it together, glue it so instead of things going prior one on a one direction of the strip ~now all is moving on both sides, and winds up where it has started and keeps on going, but one two sides), I repeat, so another illusive dimension created by the biggest 'jester of them all' the master creator = the Universal intelligence', hence it just kept being creative in some time and space as such...(no I don't know when, since there was and is no time)...illusion
    Now perception tself...
    The question of direct or "naïve" realism, as opposed to indirect or "representational" realism, arises in the philosophy of perception and of mind out of the debate over the nature of conscious experience,the epistemological question of whether the world, earth we see around us is the real world itself or merely an internal perceptual copy of that world generated by neural processes in our brain. As is the sun...same concept, but just somewhere theoretically further, or we'd burn up...suppose that ! might as well into the equation~~~
    Naïve realism is known as direct realism when developed to counter indirect or representative realism, also known as epistemological dualism,the philosophical position that our conscious experience is not of the real world itself but of an internal representation, a miniature virtual-reality replica of the world. Indirect realism is broadly equivalent to the accepted view of perception in natural science that states that we do not and can not perceive the external world as it really is but know only our ideas and interpretations of the way the world is. Representationalism is one of the key assumptions of cognitivism in psychology. The representational realist would deny that 'first hand knowledge' is a coherent concept, since knowledge is always via some means. Our ideas of the world are interpretations of sense data derived from an external world that is real (unlike the standpoint of idealism). The alternative, that we have knowledge of the outside world that is unconstrained by our sense organs and does not require interpretation, would appear to be inconsistent with everyday observation. The earth and sun relation has no relavance at all. Your talking objects, as separate things; they are not so, so get rid of the idea of even that thought of revolving or not revolving around the sun though, why does it even matter,(well it makes the average person label it all, and feel safe in their 'world'. We just have spent too much time on 'objects' -tangible things~ we, and don't care and can't,and don't understand perception, I'm still perplexed, and that is pushing the mind way out of the box ...maybe the earth is flat after all, regardless. lol but I do agree that peace or rather love first is all there is.

    -Vesa Peltonen

  13. I admire Nassim, but not as we understand entoces always the same stars.they move with us?

  14. Wouldn't both ideas be correct? When you view the sun and accompanying satellites at their oncoming angle the orbits of the planets orbit in the traditional way. When you shift your perspective the picture is different.

  15. see this link from Clif High's website "halfpasthuman"
    http://www.feandft.com/Dr.%20Bhat.htm regarding this subject

  16. but if this theory is true why would they say that uranus and the other planets have more than one moon? where would those moons placed if this theory is true?

    1. Other than the heliocentric orbit, nothing else changes. Instead of orbiting the planets in a 360* circular fashion, the moons are following the planet they orbit, creating the heliocentric orbit.

  17. I don't know the technical details about it but in our Holy Religious Book " Quran" , it is written that "every thing in the Worlds are in motion". So it is not something new information , it is obvious that if sun also moves and if its planets move around that it will be same type of path.

  18. Humans aren't love they kill each other every day!Earth is not peace. In our history books we have record of man killing each other in war from the dawn of time. Where are you from?

  19. Really? This is no "new theory". It's simply a different way of looking at what we already know. We've always known that our galaxy is in 3D, but we use the 2D version to teach.
    Anyway, we know from Retrograde Motion that the earth goes around the sun. It's not a belief, it's a fact that was proven over 500 years ago. Combine that with what we know about gravity, and relativity, I see no debate here.
    People are stupid. They watch this video, and see something that isn't there. This guy never said "The sun goes around the earth", he said "This is how it actually looks, with the earth going around the sun".

    1. It's not a new theory, but most people have no access to this kind of information. People are not stupid, only misinformed or not informed at all. How many people know that our planet is revolving around the Sun in a heliocentric movement?

      More interesting facts:

      Our planet is actually moving in six different directions within our galaxy, at a combined speed of about 574,585 mph.

      But our galaxy is also in motion and the galactic cluster - from which we are part of - is moving as well.


In order to counter the increasing amount of spam, phishing (money scam) and aggressive advertising, you are kindly invited to log in to your Google Account before leaving a comment.

Please, be polite and bring arguments to your statements. Trolling, phishing, spamming, strong language and advertising is not allowed. Thank you!



Like & Follow


What's hot?


Thanks for the coffee!







Tag cloud

About me (3) Agenda 2030 (6) Alzheimer's (2) Art. in German (33) Ayahuasca (6) Big Brother (27) Bilderberg (18) Black Knight (1) Caeli Francisco (24) Cancer (85) Chemtrails (21) Clinton (1) Cold War 2 (29) Conspiracy (507) Control (331) Cosmos (154) Crop Circles (8) Crystal Skulls (1) Dejan Davchevski (29) Depopulation (35) Documentaries (99) Ebola (3) Education (53) Empaths (10) ETs UFOs (346) False Flags (44) Fasting (6) FEMA (3) Finance (89) Fluoride (8) Forbidden History (376) Free Energy (45) Freemasonry (4) Free Spirit (8) Fukushima (26) Geoengineering (11) GMO (34) Guest Writers (3) HAARP (14) Healthcare (682) Hemp (47) Hollow Earth (5) Illuminati (35) Inspiration (472) JFK (7) Julian Websdale (11) Khali Carol (7) Lisa Morris (1) Mark Nestmann (10) Meditation (14) Michael Martin (2) Microchip Implant (7) Mind Control (33) Monsanto (4) MSM (5) Mysteries (362) News (786) Nikola Tesla (12) Nuclear Hazard (12) NWO (191) OOPArt (14) PhD Anonymous (20) Pienaar Arno (13) Pineal Gland (5) Pole Shift (6) Police State (20) Preppers (19) Pyramids (56) Q and A (6) Quotes (12) Recent Articles (3033) Reincarnation (38) Rothschild (20) Sacred Geometry (1) Sacred Water (5) Sandy Hook (4) Satanism (31) Satanist Pedophiles (38) Science (150) Secret Societies (6) Spirituality (542) Sponsor Books (3) Strange Murders (3) Sustainable Housing (6) The Anunnaki (76) The Matrix (34) The Vatican (24) Time Travel (1) Vaccines (33) Videos (270) War (8) Wheatgrass (1) Wisdom (48) WTC (9/11) (34) Zephyr Prayers (3) Zodiac (7)